Overall quality isn't too bad and somehow mediocre at best. The formatting of this particular release is a bit wonky, with a considerable amount of horrible cutoffs between pages and quite jarring to read. It seems to lack quality control by OP. "Good enough" for archival purposes and posterity. I recommend getting this https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1541656 release instead.
@seth001 I'm well aware and already took that into account. Save this one for archival purposes and get the cobalt's release (P.C version) if you want better quality in terms of presentation (cutout) and translation. The other best alternative release is the Yen Press version shared by LuCaZ.
Comments - 11
moredrowsy
Cobalt001
moredrowsy
loocool2
MidnightBlue
ecchigo
MidnightBlue
enelyafefalas
wafflescake00
seth001
wafflescake00