WEB or BDRip from here https://nyaa.iss.one/view/1853366

@ShadowVlican This is WEB video and WEB English audio with Blu-ray Japanese audio. Blu-ray is lowpassed and Beatrice did nothing to correct it among other issues with their encode, so pretty much everyone agrees 9volt’s WEBRip is better quality. We're told there is possibly a Blu-ray/WEB hybrid encode in the works that will be the definitive encode if or when it appears, but for now this is the best we've got.

>Beatrice did nothing to correct it This can't be fixed, people just take it and encode it from the web source. For those who are far from understanding video and coding: lowpassed allows you to increase image compressibility several times, which gives good video compressibility without bitrate insufficiency artifacts (visual squares in the picture, blockiness like here for example https://slow.pics/c/OVBwmxCO). In this case, this filter helps the 264 codec on BD. Different studios have been using this filter to create BDs for a long time, since 2010, but only in 2022+ did it become a mass phenomenon in creating BDs. It is impossible to fix this, you need to wait for other BD editions without this filter or encode from a web source, which is sharply at odds with the BDrip concept. LPFilt is not that bad, it's just that scenes with strong dynamics will be slightly discolored and will suffer from loss of detail. But we're watching videos, not screenshots, right? But still very unpleasant, I agree. https://slow.pics/c/hmTZCoQW Here is a good example of LPF. Japanese edition 2013 vs Italian bd 2016 without LPF. There are currently no alternative publications for Frieren. Perhaps in a year there will be a choice of other BDs. There will be a reason to redo the encoding. And I consider inflating the web source to the size of a bd even because it is “lowpassed” a useless exercise. You are watching bd or web. There is no need to turn one into another. Besides, 9Volt has already done this. There is a choice. https://slow.pics/c/bvnuYncb